La decisión de Viacom de llevar a juicio a YouTube, interpretada en mi columna de hoy de Libertad Digital: “Viacom, YouTube y Groucho Marx“.
Viacom demanda a Google por 1.000 millones de dólares
El buscador más popular de la Red considera que no incumple la ley, y añade que Viacom se construyó «a partir de litigios legales»
10 Stocks to Last the Decade, Revisited [Fool.com] February 02, 2007
Law.com - Videos Pulled From Web Sites Draw Suits
OPML, The Harvard Book of
TechCrunch: Viacom Drops a Nuke on Google
Viacom slaps YouTube with one hand, copies it with the other.
Google's lawyer responds to Viacom's lawyer: "The law is on our side."
Viacom's lawyer argues why the DMCA doesn't protect YouTube (because it "derives a financial benefit" from copyrighted material it stores that it has the "right and ability to control"
The Viacom-YouTube case should be decided by Congress, not the courts.
Why Gootube has already lost.
Viacom considers bid for Bebo
Several clips from "TDS," Colbert and "SpongeBob" are back up on the site.
After having "TDS" and "Colbert" clips taken off of YouTube--they're now appearing on Viacom-owned iFilm--what a surprise!
Over 100,000 of them--Viacom claims that YouTube and corporate parent Google have not followed through on filtering of clips (to make sure that inappropriate ads don't run on pages with Nickelodeon clips).
After having unapproved material pulled off of YouTube--Joost is a new service in beta from one of the inventors of Kaaza.
"Web Shows," with produced-for-web material from many sources, including Viacom-owned Atom, premieres on Comedy Central Monday at 1 a.m. CT.
That's what the Viacom-Joost deal means, as MediaChan explains.
Why isn't Viacom suing iFilm, another website replete with purloined TV clips, like it's suing YouTube? Because Viacom owns iFilm.